Legal Opinion

Martha Lake Water Co. No. 1 v. Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1929No. 21772. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J,

The Martha Lake Water Company, a corporation, applied to the state supervisor of hydraulics for permission to appropriate a certain quantity of the water of Martha lake for the purpose of irrigation and domestic use upon non-riparian land. The supervisor of hydraulics granted the permit to take the quantity of water applied for from the lake, for a period of three years. A number of persons owning property bordering on the lake, with riparian rights, appealed to the superior court, where a trial was had before the court without a jury. The court made findings of fact and conclusions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Proctor v. SimWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Brown v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hunter Land Co. v. LaugenourWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Madson v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Snively v. JaberWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Litka v. City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In Re Clinton Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. AbbotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API