Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hegewald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1981No. 47169-0PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dolliver, J. —

Jack Bell, real estate broker, and Margaret Junge (now Sherman), real estate salesperson, commenced this action against Mr. and Mrs. Rudy Hegewald for breach of oral contract to pay a sales commission, and against Louisiana Pacific Corporation for breach of its promise to protect their commission. At the close of plaintiffs' case, Hegewald moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that, because the oral agreement involved the sale of real property, it was brought within the statute of frauds. The trial court denied the motion.

The jury awarded Bell and Junge $197,186.04 against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gross v. City of LynnwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Powers v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Weyerhaeuser Co. Severance Pay PlanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Greaves v. Medical Imaging System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API