Hoglund v. Meeks
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*859¶1 — This case involves breach of a fee-sharing contract among attorneys who at various times served as a plaintiff’s attorney in a personal injury lawsuit otherwise unrelated to this appeal. Defendants Steven Meeks, Jay Goldstein, and Sherelle Willingham appeal the trial court’s liquidated damages award and bench trial finding that they breached their contract with plaintiff John Hoglund in failing to share the contingent attorney fee when their mutual client settled with the insurance company. Defendants argue that (1) Willingham did not have apparent authority to contract on behalf of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Becker v. Washington State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.