Legal Opinion
Hoglund v. Meeks
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 24, 2007No. 34992-2-IIPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
170 P.3d 37 (2007)
139 Wash.App. 854
John A. HOGLUND, individually and as owner and agent of John A. Hoglund, P.S., Respondent,
v.
Steven MEEKS, Jay Goldstein and Sherrelle Willingham; Goldstein Law Office, Appellants.
No. 34992-2-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
July 24, 2007.
Steven Meeks, Olympia, WA, pro se.
John Michael Morgan, J. Michael Morgan PLLC, Olympia, WA, for Appellants.
Michael Wayne Johns, Davis Roberts & Johns PLLC, Gig Harbor, WA, for Respondent.
PUBLISHED IN PART OPINION
HUNT, J.
¶ 1 This case involves breach of a fee-sharing contract among attorneys who at various times…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barbara Knapke v. Peopleconnect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Becker v. Washington State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.