Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Weyerhaeuser Co. Severance Pay Plan
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 14, 1985No. 6630-1-IIPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
Doris Barrett appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing her action for severance pay under the Weyerhaeuser Company Severance Pay Plan (Plan). We affirm.
Doris Barrett worked for the Weyerhaeuser Company at its Cosmopolis plant from November 26, 1956, until April 11, 1980. In February 1980, Weyerhaeuser reorganized its operation. Mrs. Barrett was assigned a new position that combined new duties with some of the duties she previously had performed. After 3 days at her new position, Mrs. Barrett concluded the job imposed unreasonable demands upon her. She told Weyerhaeuser supervisory…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- James JOHNSON and Benjamin White, Appellants, v. BUNNY BREAD COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Martini v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Martini v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.