Legal Opinion
Adkins v. Wyckoff
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1957No. Civ. 17240PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’DONNELL, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment denying him any relief under any of his five causes of action.
Defendant Wyckoff had been for some time engaged in the advertising business. In 1952 he formed the defendant corporation (then named Wyckoff & Downard, Inc.) for the purpose of carrying on the advertising business. Three hundred shares of capital stock were issued to Wyekoff. He trans ferred some of these shares to Downard. Later Downard left the business and Wyckoff reacquired his stock. Wyckoff thus again owned all of the outstanding stock.
Plaintiff was also…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bourke v. FriskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Duntley v. KagariseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Randall v. BeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Andrew v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Gormly v. DickinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- DeRasmo v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.