Legal Opinion

Benner v. Hooper

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1931No. Docket No. 7167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

Since the submission of this cause Freda H. Benner, one of the plaintiffs, has died and Anson Bilger, as administrator of the estate of said Freda H. Benner, deceased, has been substituted as a party to this action.

W. H. Hooper, one of the defendants in this action, built a house for his wife, Dorothy G. Hooper, also a defendant in this action. The house was built on a lot purchased by Mrs. Hooper and it was intended for her own use and occupation. The house was built on filled in land over a creek-bed. Mrs. Hooper told her husband to put up a sign and try to sell it.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Syah v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Boas v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Brady v. CarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Williamson v. ClapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Lewis v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API