Legal Opinion
California Medical Products, Inc. v. Tecnol Medical Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 29, 1995No. Civil A. 91-620-LONPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
I. NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiff California Medical Products, Inc. (“CalMed”), also known as Laerdal California, commenced this action for patent infringement on November 18, 1991. CalMed alleges that defendant Tecnol Medical Products (“Tecnol”) manufactures and sells a cervical collar, the 911 First Response Col lar (the “911 collar”), which infringes U.S. Patent Re. 32,219 (the ’219 patent) both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. Through its answer and counterclaim for declaratory relief, Tecnol denies that it infringes the ’219 patent…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clontech Laboratories, Inc. v. Invitrogen Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Burandt v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. DickinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. John Maneely Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2000
- Gentile v. Franklin Sports, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.