Legal Opinion
Gentile v. Franklin Sports, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 1, 2002No. CIV. 01-10332-NGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERTNER, District Judge.
Before me is Magistrate Judge Dein’s Report and Recommendation on Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment, dated February 15, 2002 (“Report”). I hereby adopt the findings and conclusions of Judge Dein detailed in her Report. Defendant Franklin Sports, Inc.’s (“Franklin”) motion for summary judgment [docket entry # 30] is DENIED in its entirety. Plaintiff Robert Gentile’s (“Gentile”) cross-motion for summary judgment [docket entry #33] is GRANTED with regard to Count I, patent infringement, and DENIED with regard to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia University v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002