Legal Opinion

Clontech Laboratories, Inc. v. Invitrogen Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 20, 2003No. C.A.98-750-SLRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 22, 1998, plaintiff Clon-tech Laboratories, Inc. (“Clontech”) filed suit against defendant Invitrogen Corporation (formerly Life Technologies, Inc. or “LTI”) alleging false marking pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 292. (D.I.l) Plaintiffs complaint was subsequently amended to include allegations of violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and the Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), 6 Del. C. § 2531 et seq. (D.I.83, 137) The case was then temporarily stayed pending the outcome of related litigation in the United States…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Life Technologies, Inc. v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Grand Ventures, Inc. v. WhaleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Mayview Corp. v. RodsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Horace B. Brose v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clontech Laboratories, Inc. v. Invitrogen Corp. (Formerly Life Technologies, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. DP Wagner Manufacturing Inc. v. Pro Patch Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  3. Brinkmeier v. BIC CORP.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
  5. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY v. Pacific Award Metals, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API