Legal Opinion
Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. John Maneely Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 19, 2000No. CIV 99-1926-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
On October 27, 1999, Plaintiff Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation (“Allied”) filed a Complaint alleging that Defendants John Maneely Company (“Maneely”), Razor Wire International, L.L.C. (“Razor Wire”), and Perry Shumway, infringed on its patent, U.S. Patent No. 4,509,726 (“ ’726 Patent”), through manufacture and sale of barbed tape products. Pending before the Court is Allied’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
Discussion
To obtain a preliminary injunction, Allied, the moving party, must establish that: “(1) it has a reasonable likelihood of succeeding on the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Glycobiosciences, Inc. v. Innocutis Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015