Jamison v. Lindsay
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Lisa Jamison sued Drs. Stuart Lindsay and Charles Hanford for medical malpractice. Trial by jury resulted in a special verdict determining that neither Lindsay nor Hanford had been negligent. The court rendered judgment on the verdict, and the present appeal ensued.
Appellant consulted respondent Hanford, an obstetrician and gynecologist, for examination of a pelvic mass. Dr. Hanford examined appellant, then aged 16, and determined that she probably had a tumor in her right ovary. A few days later he performed surgery. He removed appellant’s right ovary and a large cystic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Merlo v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Truman v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hahn v. MirdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Atkins v. StrayhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Moore v. Preventive Medicine Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Vandi v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Foy v. GreenblottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.