Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Mirda

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 2007No. A112854PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

In this appeal from a ruling on a demurrer, we consider this factual predicate: A woman is told she has a particularly aggressive form of breast cancer. She undergoes chemotherapy and has a radical mastectomy in an attempt to save her life. The pathology report prepared after the surgery shows the woman did not have cancer at all. The woman’s doctors learn their patient did not have cancer, but they do not tell her. As a result, the woman lives for more than two years believing she has a fatal disease. We hold these facts can support her husband’s independent cause of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Tietsworth v. SearsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  3. Sanders v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. Boschma v. Home Loan Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Oestreicher v. Alienware Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API