Legal Opinion

Foy v. Greenblott

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1983No. Civ. No. 48942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Virgie Foy, an incompetent person, and Reffie Foy, her minor child, appeal from a judgment on demurrer dismissing an action by which damages were sought on allegations that Virgie became pregnant, and Reffie was bom, because of negligence on the part of respondents Bradley Greenblott, M.D., Richard Slade, M.D., Ronald Diebel, M.D., San Jose Care and Guidance Center, and the County of Santa Clara.

Appellants alleged that Virgie Foy had been adjudicated a gravely disabled and incompetent person under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq.). The…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Conservatorship of WendlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Riese v. St. Mary's Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Keyhea v. RushenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Conservatorship of Valerie N.California Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API