Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Strayhorn

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1990No. D008995PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Defendants Eugene H. Strayhorn, Jr., M.D., and his professional corporation, Eugene H. Strayhorn, M.D., Inc. (together Stray-horn), appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Owren B. Atkins, Jr., and Eileen L. Atkins (together Atkinses 1 ) on Atkinses’ complaint for professional negligence. Strayhorn contends the court erred in (1) allowing Atkinses to exploit an informed consent theory of liability and to offer as expert testimony the opinion of a physician unqualified in emergency room care, (2) failing to reduce the verdict under Civil Code 2 section 3333.2 before applying…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Aaron Schwarder Donna Eubanks Kathleen Schwarder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Robinson v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API