Legal Opinion
Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1987No. 86-913PublishedCited by 840 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
The issue presented is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment for appellants. Our task is therefore to apply Civ. R. 56(C)1 to the evidence and allegations contained in the record.
I
Appellee first maintains that Hesketh failed to comply with R.C. 4513.28(D)2 and was therefore negligent per se. See Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co. (1946), 146 Ohio St. 657, 33 O.O. 154, 67 N.E. 2d 851; Schalk v. Spreckelmeier (1971), 27 Ohio App. 2d 210, 56 O.O. 2d 389, 273 N.E. 2d 795. Appellants concede that R.C. 4513.28(D) applies, but they argue that Hesketh’s failure to set out flags was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Sharon L. Batesole, Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence L. Batesole, Deceased v. Jack E. StratfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Tomlinson v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by840 opinions
- White v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Baiko v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sikora v. WenzelOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Federated Management Co. v. Coopers & LybrandOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
835 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.