Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1984No. 83-1955PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

The reasons for incarcerating a convicted felon are multiple, such as rehabilitation and punishment. It is unquestioned that one of the reasons felons are incarcerated is for the protection of society. R.C. 2967.26 is a statute designed to give greater flexibility to Ohio’s prison system in the attempt to help rehabilitate prisoners. The statute does not, however, ignore the other reasons prisoners are set apart from society. This is self-evident from the language of R.C. 2967.26(B), which requires the state to confine a furloughed prisoner during any nonworking periods. A breach of this duty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Claypool v. Mohawk Motor, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Rhodus v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Bussard v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Claims · 1986
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. C.L. v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Feichtner v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API