Legal Opinion

Arnesen v. Anchorage Refuse, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1996No. S-7401PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Jim Amesen challenges decisions of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board holding that he was ineligible for reemployment benefits because he was trained as and acted as a real estate sales agent within the ten years preceding his injury; that his reason able wage earning capacity was $33,000; and that he was ineligible to claim two children as dependents in the calculation of his spendable weekly wage at the time of his injury.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Arnesen worked for Anchorage Refuse as a heavy equipment mechanic from 1984 until 1993. He injured his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Coghill v. CoghillAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Vandenberg v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Robinson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lawson v. LawsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Shawn Murphy v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API