Legal Opinion

Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1993No. S-5011PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Yahara injured his back in the course of his employment with Construction & Rigging, Inc., and sought reemployment benefits under the vocational rehabilitation provisions of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Act, AS 23.30.041. The Reemployment Benefits Administrator (R.B.A.) granted Yahara’s request for benefits, and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed the award. The superior court reversed the Board, finding that the medical opinion on which the Board relied did not constitute substantial evidence. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Delaney v. Alaska AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. J & L Diversified Enterprises, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Whaley v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Alaska Public Employees Ass'n v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cowen v. Wal-MartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API