Legal Opinion

Vandenberg v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2016No. 7096 S-15935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After a work-related injury left a nurse with a permanent partial impairment, she applied for reemployment benefits. The re habilitation specialist assigned to her case used two job descriptions to describe one of the nurse's former jobs because the specialist did not think that a single job description adequately described that former job. The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board decided that only one job description was needed and that the nurse retained the physical capacity to perform the functions of that job description; it therefore denied her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Louie v. BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Humphrey v. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Alaska Interstate Constr. Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Shawn Murphy v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Unisea, Inc. v. De LopezAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Sandra J. Rusch v. Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium and Alaska National Insurance Company, Brenda Dockter v. SEARHC and Alaska National Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API