Legal Opinion

Youst v. Longo

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1987No. L.A. 32114PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.

Is a racehorse owner entitled to tort damages when the harness driver of another horse1 negligently or intentionally interferes with the owner’s horse during a race, thereby preventing the owner from the chance of winning a particular cash prize? It is a well-settled general tort principle that interference with the chance of winning a contest, such as the horserace at issue here, usually presents a situation too uncertain upon which to base tort liability. We agree that application of this principle should govern here. Further, even if the outcome of the race was certain, as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Albert White v. Turfway Park Racing Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API