Nicolosi v. Clark
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The complaint charged that the defendant was a street contractor, and in pursuance of his business was engaged under a contract with the city of Sacramento in excavating a sewer trench in one of the streets of that city; that during the progress of this work the roadbed and sidewalks were open to the traveling public; that in the prosecution of his work defendant kept upon this street a large box used for storing tools and implements; that this box was standing within three feet of the sidewalk; that there was kept in this large box a small box containing dynamite caps; that plaintiff,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Loftus v. DehailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Faylor v. Great Eastern Quicksilver Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Lambert v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Knight v. Kaiser Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.