Legal Opinion
State v. Cholewinsk
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 11, 1967No. File 129596PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, State Reeeree.
In the acquisition of a site in Bridgeport for a mental health center, the state on March 15, 1967, instituted this action under the provisions of General Statutes §48-12 for the ascertainment of the compensation which should be paid to the named defendant for her property at 68 Mead Street and a determination of the encumbrance thereon of the defendant bank. At a hear ing on October 30, 1967, the parties appeared and presented evidence to sustain their respective claims.
From consideration of all of the evidence and after viewing the property, I conclude that the fair…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Housing Authority v. PezenikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- City of Waterbury v. MacKenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Lew v. BraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Pettis v. Town of PomfretSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
- Cohn v. City & Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Bellingham v. Eiford Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission of Indiana v. Blackiston Land Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- In Re BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State Dept. of Highways v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1975