Legal Opinion

Housing Authority v. Pezenik

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 23, 1951PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

On September 27, 1939, the plaintiff instituted condemnation proceedings under General Statutes, Rev. 1930, § 5072 (Rev. 1949, §7181). It sought to condemn property belonging to the named defendant in Bridgeport for a housing development for families of low income. In accordance with the terms of the statute, the matter was referred to a committee on October 13, 1939, for the assessment of damages. The committee filed their report on December 4, 1939. Judgment was rendered on an amended report on July 26, 1948, and both parties appealed.

The case has been before the Superior Court for. nearly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. TullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  3. New Milford Water Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  4. City of Waterbury v. MacKenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Clark v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. State v. MarianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  4. State v. CobbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Great Country Bank v. PastoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API