Legal Opinion
City of Waterbury v. MacKen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1924PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The complaint sets out that at a duly-named meeting of the board of park commissioners of Waterbury, it was voted to purchase certain real property owned by the defendant John B. Maeken, for an addition to Waterville Park in Waterbury, and to authorize its president, Terrence F. Carmody, to negotiate with the defendants John B. Maeken and M. L. Maeken, mortgagee, for its purchase, for a price not in excess of $10,000; and that if Maeken would not agree to sell for this sum, to authorize president Carmody to take such steps as might be necessary for, and on behalf of this board, to condemn…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Bulkeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Booth v. Town of WoodburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- New Milford Water Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Webster v. Town of HarwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Lew v. BraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- M. Dematteo Construction Co. v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Housing Authority v. PezenikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Connelly v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.