Legal Opinion

City of Bellingham v. Eiford Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 15, 1974No. 1171-2PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

In December of 1970, the City of Bellingham commenced an action to acquire appellant’s real property by condemnation for the construction of a sewage treatment plant. The trial on damages began October 26, 1971, before a jury, and a verdict was rendered fixing the amount of just compensation on November 5,1971.

There is no dispute as to the facts with respect to the right of the appellant condemnee to be awarded reasonable attorney fees and reasonable expert witness fees. However, prior to entry of the judgment and award, but subsequent to the commencement of this action, the legislature…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. GuthrieIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. City of Renton v. Dillingham Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holton v. F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Kilpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Anderson v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API