Legal Opinion
In Re Bellingham
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 15, 1974No. 1171-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 Wn. App. 606 (1974)
519 P.2d 1330
In the Matter of the Petition of THE CITY OF BELLINGHAM.
THE CITY OF BELLINGHAM, Respondent,
v.
EIFORD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 1171-2.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
February 15, 1974.
T.B. Asmundson (of Asmundson, Rhea & Atwood) and Monheimer, Schermer, Van Fredenberg & Smith, for appellant.
Gordon G. Conger (of Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis, Holman & Fletcher), for respondent.
ARMSTRONG, J.
In December of 1970, the City of Bellingham commenced an action to acquire appellant's real property by condemnation for the construction of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
- Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. GuthrieIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Renton v. Dillingham Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petersen v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 1974