Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2006No. 2006-0392PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David Lee Engler of Boardman, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0030264, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1985.

{¶ 2} On October 10, 2005, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with violating the Code of Professional Responsibility by engaging in a sexual relationship with a client. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances *139and Discipline heard the cause on the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement, filed pursuant to Section 11 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board of Commissioners on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PaxtonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietroOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RessingOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DetweilerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. ParisOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchmalzOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DetweilerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API