Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1993No. 92-2527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

After reading the testimonial letters submitted by respondent, we agree with the findings and recommendation of the board. We hereby publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re AshySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. In Re HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KodishOhio Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API