Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1993No. 92-2527PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
After reading the testimonial letters submitted by respondent, we agree with the findings and recommendation of the board. We hereby publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re AshySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- In Re HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KodishOhio Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.