Legal Opinion

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Paris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2016No. 2015-2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Tasso Paris of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0038609, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987.

{¶ 2} In a January 2015 complaint, relator, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, alleged that Paris violated multiple Rules of Professional Conduct by making unwelcome sexual advances toward a female client and failing to appear at her criminal-sentencing hearing.

{¶ 3} The parties entered into stipulations of fact, misconduct, and aggravating and mitigating factors and jointly recommended that Paris be suspended from the practice of law for six months,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. SturgeonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Leon.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. AbramsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. Fortado (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. ParisOhio Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API