Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Detweiler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2010No. 2010-1104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, William Jeffrey Detweiler of Akron, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039269, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987. On February 8, 2010, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct by engaging in a sexual relationship with a client. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline considered the cause on the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement, filed pursuant to Section 11 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board of Commissioners on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. EnglerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchmalzOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. DetweilerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bartels (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DuganOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API