Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schmalz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2009No. 2009-0661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a complaint against Cincinnati lawyer Anna Schmalz, Attorney Registration No. 0078103, for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we adopt the stipulated facts and accede to the respondent’s consent-to-discipline agreement in the form of a public reprimand. In the consent-to-discipline agreement, respondent admits that she violated her oath of office and also violated Prof.Cond.R. 1.7(a)(2) (a lawyer’s representation of a client creates a conflict of interest if there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SturgeonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. EnglerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietroOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DetweilerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SeibelOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. DetweilerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Allen County Bar Ass'n v. BartelsOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API