Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Detweiler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2013No. 2012-1711PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, William Jeffrey Detweiler of Akron, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039269, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987.

{¶ 2} In October 2010, we publicly reprimanded Detweiler for engaging in an improper sexual relationship with his client. Disciplinary Counsel v. Detweiler, 127 Ohio St.3d 73, 2010-Ohio-5033, 936 N.E.2d 498. On July 26, 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Detweiler with engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law by soliciting a client for sexual favors and continuing to represent the client despite the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. SturgeonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. LockshinOhio Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. SleibiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lake County Bar Association v. MismasOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Benbow.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bartels (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API