Legal Opinion
Norden v. Hartman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 1952No. Civ. 4255PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff recovered a jury verdict for $25,-000 against defendant for claimed malpractice. The court granted a new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
On May 15, 1942, plaintiff, aged 55, as a result of a 12-foot fall, suffered a very severe comminuted (crushed or shattered) fracture of his right os calcis or heel hone. The injury was covered by workmen’s compensation. Plaintiff was, after first aid, treated by Dr. Markey, who promptly had him hospitalized and referred the case to Dr. Redell, a specialist in industrial surgery. On May 25, 1942, he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Norden v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Barrese v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Crane v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Keeler v. SchulteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.