Legal Opinion
Barrese v. Murray
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 2011No. B217011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
Respondent Katherine Bárrese sued appellant Jacques Gaston Murray under the authority of Marvin v. Marvin (1976) 18 Cal.3d 660 [134 Cal.Rptr. 815, 557 P.2d 106] (Marvin) and was awarded $5.7 million by a jury. Although the trial court stated in the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial that respondent could not be believed, the court denied the motion because it concluded that it did not have the power to set aside the jury’s verdict.
On April 18, 2011, we filed an unpublished opinion (B217011) in which we held that the trial court erred when it ruled that it did not have…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- David v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Pacific Corporate Group Holdings v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ryan v. Crown Castle NG Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hatai v. Peo. of the State of Cal. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.