Legal Opinion

Crane v. Middleton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1954No. Civ. 8352PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

This is an appeal upon the judgment roll from an order granting a new trial to Artie Norgard Gordon, respondent herein.

Plaintiffs commenced an action against defendants for an injunction and for damages resulting from alleged diversions of water from a watercourse which flowed through the lands of the parties. One of the defendants named in the caption of the complaint was “Artie Norgard Gordon, Executrix of the Estate of Elmer Norgard, deceased.” Artie Norgard Gordon was the daughter of Elmer Norgard, deceased, and the executrix of his estate. Prior to the trial of the action, plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feigin v. KutchorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. In Re Estate of WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Brinkerhoff v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Norden v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. White v. Aetna Life InsursanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Vanni v. Charles E. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Weinman v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API