Locomobile Co. of America v. Belasco
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward P. Shortall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The action is one in replevin for the return of an automobile sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, the plaintiff’s right to replevin the same being based upon the theory that at the time of the commencement of the action the defendant was in default in the payment of the sum of $350 due under the terms of a lease note, or conditional sale agreement, evidencing the transaction, and which agreement provided that in the event of default the plaintiff might retake possession of the ear. Defendant contends, on the other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Ampuero v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Goldenberg v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Pacific States Automotive Finance Corp. v. AddisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Bartelme v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.