Angerosa v. White Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
Asserting that they were induced to purchase a motor truck through the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant as to its capacity, plaintiffs elected to rescind the sale and brought this action to recover the purchase price paid for the vehicle. They were successful at the Trial Term.
It is said that Mr. Miller, a salesman of the defendant, assured the plaintiffs that the truck was built to carry ten or twelve tons, without being overloaded at the latter figure. There is evidence tending to show that this assertion was false.
Appellant insists, however, that it is not responsible…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Albany City Savings Institution v. . BurdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Sabo v. DelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Scientific Holding Company, Ltd. v. Plessey IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Jackson v. Mishkin (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.