Legal Opinion

Ampuero v. Luce

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1945No. Civ. 12734PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

The plaintiff and defendant Beatrice S. Luce are owners in joint tenancy of a parcel of real property. This suit was brought to quiet title, to enforce a constructive trust and to cancel the deed to the property as to defendant’s interest, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The appeal is from a judgment in defendant’s favor.

The appellant and Addie E. Ampuero, his wife, had their home on Pruitvale Avenue near East 14th Street in Oakland. It had cost about $12,000, was unencumbered and stood in the wife’s name. The couple were getting along in years and the wife, who was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. O'Melia v. AdkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Gelfand v. O'HAVERCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Mazzera v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API