Ampuero v. Luce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
The plaintiff and defendant Beatrice S. Luce are owners in joint tenancy of a parcel of real property. This suit was brought to quiet title, to enforce a constructive trust and to cancel the deed to the property as to defendant’s interest, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The appeal is from a judgment in defendant’s favor.
The appellant and Addie E. Ampuero, his wife, had their home on Pruitvale Avenue near East 14th Street in Oakland. It had cost about $12,000, was unencumbered and stood in the wife’s name. The couple were getting along in years and the wife, who was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- O'Melia v. AdkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gelfand v. O'HAVERCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Mazzera v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.