Bartelme v. Merced Irr. Dist.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The appellee is a public corporation, organized under the Irrigation District Law of California (St. 1897, p. 254, as amended and supplemented). It was engaged in an extensive irrigation project. For reservoir purposes it deemed it necessary to acquire title to the Horseshoe Bend ranch, the property of the appellants. The price demanded by the appellants was $150,000. The price offered by the appellee was $80,000. Am. understanding was reached, and on October 19,1923, the appellee submitted to the appellants a letter as expressing the terms thereof. On the same day the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Comerford v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Thompsonville Scale Manufacturing Co. v. OsgoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Locomobile Co. of America v. BelascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Electroglas, Inc. v. Dynatex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
- United States v. Willard E. Fraser Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1970
- Adams v. Union Dime Sav. BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009