Legal Opinion

Sanborn v. Sanborn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1934No. Civ. 8983PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

The parties herein, formerly husband and wife, executed an agreement authorized by sections 158 and 159 of the Civil Code wherein provision was made for monthly payments by appellant to respondent in a specified sum for support, and wherein it was agreed that the obligation to make such payments “is secured by a lien upon the income” of certain real property owned by appellant, and that “the rents, issues and profits therefrom are charged and impressed with the payment of the amounts hereinbefore provided to be paid”. Upon this contract respondent brought suit to recover…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hogarty v. HogartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Green v. Green (1944)California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Dupuy v. Western State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Robertson v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Taysom v. TaysomIdaho Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API