Legal Opinion

People v. Becker

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1934No. Crim. No. 2553PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Defendant was convicted of three counts of violation of section 288a, one count violation of *164section 286 and one count violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. The alleged acts took place between defendant and the complaining witness, a boy of eleven years, in the store of defendant where the latter was engaged in the malt and liquor business.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, especially by reason of the fact that the complaining witness was an accomplice and corroboration as required by Penal Code, section 1111, was lacking. A…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. People v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. RaichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. State v. MadridIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API