Legal Opinion

Hogarty v. Hogarty

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1922No. S. F. No. 9713PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to modify an interlocutory decree of divorce.

Appellant, William E. Hogarty, and respondent, Mary E. Hogarty, were married January 11, 1892, and on July 10, 1918, appellant commenced a suit for divorce on the grounds of desertion and extreme cruelty. On April 3, 1919, an interlocutory decree was granted on the ground of extreme cruelty alone, and on April 6, 1920, the court entered its final decree of divorce. No appeal from either judgment was taken.

On March 18, 1919, appellant and respondent entered into an agreement settling their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ex parte AmbroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Duncan v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API