Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Robertson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1939No. Civ. 10851PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

J.-—This is an action by plaintiff to recover the sum of $2,050, representing an accumulation of $50 a month arising from a reduction from $300 to $250 in the monthly payments made by defendant to plaintiff for her support and maintenance following their divorce. The trial court decreed that the property settlement agreement sued upon, providing for the payment to plaintiff of the sum of $300 a month, is a valid, existing and enforcible contract between the parties but that, while entitled to the payment of such amount each month, she is estopped from collecting the unpaid portions thereof,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Green v. Green (1944)California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Berrilla K. Viles v. James VilesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API