Legal Opinion

The Lane Implement Co. v. Lowder and Manning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from the Prolate Court of Pawnee Countyj lefore-William L. Eagleton, Prolate Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Buewell, J.:

The Lane Implement company sued LB. Lowder on a promissory note before a justice of the peace, and counsel caused an attachment to issue out of that court, which was levied on certain property of the defendant. On the same day the defendant gave a forthcoming bond, with J. H. Manning as surety. At the tria!, judgment was rendered for plaintiff, the attachment sustained, and the attached property ordered sold; but when the officer attempted to take the property under the order of sale, it could not be found. The Lane Implement company then commenced this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Sponenbarger v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Peterson v. WoollenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Wolf v. HahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Case v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Wilkinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API