Wolf v. Hahn
Supreme Court of Kansas
jError from Bourbon District Court. At the May Term, 1882, of the district court, Hahn, as plaintiff, had judgment for $110 and costs, against defendants Wolf and another, who bring the case here. The opinion, states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
The facts in this case are briefly as follows: •On October 28,1881, one Rhoda Parkin commenced an action against Jacob Poorman. In such action an attachment was issued and levied upon certain personal property then in possession of defendant in error, Ered. Hahn. After the levy had been made, Hahn went to one W. F. Wells and induced him to execute a redelivery bond for the forthcoming of the property, or its appraised value, to answer the judgment. Thereupon the constable returned the property to Hahn, who kept it in his possession until…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sponenbarger v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Dorr v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Gray v. MacLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
- Haxtun v. SizerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Bacon v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- The Lane Implement Co. v. Lowder and ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Woods-Egan Live-Stock Commission Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Bradley Hubbard Manufacturing Co. v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.