Peterson v. Woollen
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Jewell District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
January 22, 1889, the plaintiff, who was plaintiff below, filed her petition in replevin alleging absolute ownership in herself of certain personal property, the right to immediate possession, and wrongful detention of the same. The answer admitted the taking of the property by the defendant, Woollen, sheriff of the county, on an attachment issued in the suit of Case, Bishop & Co. against Henry Peterson, husband of the plaintiff, but as, an answer to the plaintiff’s claim to said property, and as matter of estoppel, alleged that when said property was attached as the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pryce v. StatlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Sponenbarger v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Spear v. Ward & WifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Corning v. GroheSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Jaggar v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- The Lane Implement Co. v. Lowder and ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Bank of Santa Fe v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Woods-Egan Live-Stock Commission Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.