Case v. Shultz
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jewell District Court. At the April Term, 1883, Shultz & Hosea had judgment against interpleaders, Case, Bishop & Co., who bring it here for review. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action for the recovery of money, commenced by Charles H. Shultz and Isaac T. Hosea, ■copartners doing business under the firm-name of Shultz & Hosea, against N. S. Doty, Frank Doty, Charles Doty and William Doty, copartners doing business under the firm-name of Doty Brothers & Co. An order of attachment was issued-in the case, and was levied upon certain barbed wire and galvanized wire, as the property of the defendants. Afterward, •George H. Case, George S. Bishop and David Heron, co-. partners doing business under the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sponenbarger v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- The Lane Implement Co. v. Lowder and ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901