Legal Opinion

Von Schrader v. Milton

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1929No. Docket No. 3644PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action to recover $4,800 which respondents allege was obtained from them through fraud. Judgment went for plaintiffs in the sum of $2,635. Only one defendant, Long Beach National Bank, appeals from said judgment.

On February 21, 1923, Alice Welstead, assignor of plaintiffs, entered into a contract in writing to purchase from defendant Bolivar Holding Company, for a consideration of $9,300, 93 shares of its capital stock, and, also, a 99-year lease upon an apartment in a building to be erected by said corporation. Said contract was thereafter assigned to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Emery v. . PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. Muscupiabe Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Walsh v. MckeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Escamilla v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API