Legal Opinion

Escamilla v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 2006No. D046822PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, Acting P. J.

The State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDC) appeals an order granting inmate Carlos Escamilla’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and awarding him $225 for personal property CDC did not return to him. On appeal, CDC contends the order should be reversed because: (1) a writ of habeas corpus cannot be used for recovery of personal property or money damages; (2) Escamilla’s claim is barred by his failure to comply with the claims presentation requirements of the California Tort Claims Act (the Act) (Gov. Code, § 810 et seq.); 1 and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. VillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Ramirez v. Tulare County District Attorney's OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API